https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東勞青處：青年的預算翻了快四倍，勞工的少了兩成多。這個處的名字，第一個字是「勞」數字驗算實例：勞青處預算從民國 112 年到今年，勞工由 2 億 2,600 萬降到 1 億 7,600 萬，青年由 4,400 萬升到 1 億 6,400 萬；再對照勞動部年報的檢查場次與違法比例。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Department of Labor and Youth Development: the youth budget nearly quadrupled while the labor budget fell by more than 20%. Labor comes first in its name A number-check example: from 2023 to this year, the department's labor budget fell from NT$226 million to NT$176 million while its youth budget rose from NT$44 million to NT$164 million, checked against the Ministry of Labor's inspection counts and violation rates. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の労働青年発展処：青年予算は約4倍、労働予算は2割以上減。この処の名前の最初の字は「労」数字の検算の実例：民国112年から今年までに、労働青年発展処の労働予算は2億2,600万元から1億7,600万元に減り、青年予算は4,400万元から1億6,400万元に増えました。労働部年報の検査件数と違反率とも照合しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府 2,018 筆社區團體補助，報表卻對不上 2,276 萬數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府 115/7/20 公告的上半年補助報表，2,872 筆明細逐列加總 3 億 7,656 萬元，首頁合計 3 億 5,380 萬元，明細多出 2,276 萬元；7/9 的前一版差額方向相反。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 2,018 community group grants from Pingtung County, and a report that is NT$22,760,000 off A number-check example: in the half-year grant report Pingtung County Government published on 20 July 2026, the 2,872 line items add up to NT$376,560,000 while the summary page states NT$353,800,000, a difference of NT$22,760,000. The version published on 9 July was off in the opposite direction. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府、地域団体への補助2,018件。報告書は2,276万元合わず数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府が民国115年7月20日に公告した上半期の補助報告書では、明細2,872件を1行ずつ合計すると3億7,656万元、総括ページの合計は3億5,380万元で、明細が2,276万元多くなっています。7月9日の前の版では差が逆方向でした。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府標案近六成只有一家投標，要投標得先會作夢？數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府 114 年公開競爭的 958 件標案中，565 件只有一家投標，將近六成；115 年 2 至 8 月為 52%。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg Nearly 60% of Pingtung County tenders drew a single bidder. Do you have to dream it up before you can bid? A number-check example: of the 958 openly competed tenders Pingtung County Government awarded in 2025 (ROC year 114), 565 drew a single bidder, nearly 60%. From February to August 2026 (ROC year 115) the share was 52%. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府の入札、約6割が1社だけの応札。入札するには、まず夢を見る力が必要？数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府が民国114年に公開競争で落札させた958件のうち、565件は応札が1社だけで、約6割でした。民国115年2月から8月では52%です。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg 只有一家來投，就一定有問題嗎？三種解釋，三種痕跡問題發掘實例：屏東縣政府標案將近六成只有一家來投。先列出三種解釋：真的很難、法律允許第二次一家決標、有人先知道了；每一種留下的痕跡不同，再逐案對照。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg A single bidder: does it always mean something is wrong? Three explanations, three kinds of traces An issue-discovery example: nearly 60% of Pingtung County Government tenders drew a single bidder. Three explanations come first: the job is genuinely hard; the law allows a single bid on the second round; or someone knew in advance. Each leaves different traces, which are then checked case by case. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg 応札が1社だけなら、必ず問題があるのか？3つの説明、3つの痕跡問題の発見の実例：屏東県政府の入札案件の約6割は応札が1社だけ。まず3つの説明を挙げます。本当に難しい、法律上2回目は1社でも落札できる、誰かが事前に知っていた。それぞれ残る痕跡が違うため、1件ずつ照合します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg 花 1,319 萬修租來的房子，修好只剩一年半就要還？屏東職人町陳情分流實例：屏東職人町耐震補強 1,319 萬元，其中勞動部前瞻補助 994 萬元，補助名目是職訓及勞工中心；租約明年底到期。審計部已回函表示會辦理專案調查。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 55 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg NT$13,190,000 to repair a leased building, with only a year and a half left before it goes back? Pingtung's Artisan Town A petition-routing example: the NT$13,190,000 seismic retrofit of Pingtung's Artisan Town included NT$9,940,000 in Forward-Looking Infrastructure funding from the Ministry of Labor, granted for a vocational training and labor center. The lease ends at the end of next year. The National Audit Office has replied that it will open a special investigation. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 55 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg 借りた建物の修繕に1,319万元、修繕後1年半で返還？屏東の職人町陳情の振り分けの実例：屏東・職人町の耐震補強1,319万元のうち、994万元は労働部の前瞻補助で、名目は職業訓練・労働センターでした。賃貸契約は来年末に満了します。審計部は特別調査を行うと回答しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 55 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg 縣府的青年頻道，最新 30 支影片 26 支看不到 100 次問題發掘實例：屏東縣政府勞青處的青年頻道，最新 30 支影片有 26 支觀看未滿 100 次，中位數 24 次；再對照旅遊創新人才培育計畫的決標公告與中央補助金額。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 70 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg The county's youth channel: 26 of its latest 30 videos have under 100 views An issue-discovery example: on the youth channel run by Pingtung County's Department of Labor and Youth Development, 26 of the latest 30 videos had fewer than 100 views, with a median of 24, checked against the award notice and central government funding for a tourism innovation training program. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 70 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg 県政府の青年向けチャンネル、最新30本のうち26本が再生100回未満問題の発見の実例：屏東県政府労働青年発展処の青年向けチャンネルでは、最新30本のうち26本が再生100回未満、中央値は24回。観光イノベーション人材育成計画の落札公告と中央政府の補助額とも照合しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 70 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg 假設縣府代金券也玩三店方式，這種活動可以辦嗎？（下）問題發掘實例：以日本柏青哥的三店方式為對照，假設縣府代金券的發放核銷廠商與收券店家是同一位老闆，每一步都合法，整個活動能不能辦？ https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 59 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg What if a county voucher scheme used the "three-shop system"? Could an event like this go ahead? (Part 2) An issue-discovery example: using the three-shop system of Japanese pachinko as a reference, suppose the contractor that issues and redeems a county's vouchers and a shop that accepts them have the same owner. Every step is legal. Can the event as a whole go ahead? https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 59 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg もし県の商品券が「三店方式」をまねたら、こんなイベントは開けるのか？（後編）問題の発見の実例：日本のパチンコの三店方式を参照し、県の商品券の配布と換金を請け負う業者と、券を受け取る店のオーナーが同じ人物だと仮定します。どの段階も合法。では、イベント全体は開けるのでしょうか。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 59 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg 日本柏青哥為什麼合法？三店方式，每一步都合法（上）問題發掘實例：以柏青哥店、獎品收購店與批發商的往來，說明三店方式的流程，為下集的縣府代金券假設題建立對照。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg Why is Japanese pachinko legal? The three-shop system, one legal step at a time (Part 1) An issue-discovery example: follow the pachinko parlor, prize-buying shop and wholesaler to establish a comparison for Part 2’s hypothetical county voucher scheme. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg 日本のパチンコはなぜ合法なのか。三店方式、どの段階も合法（前編）問題の発見の実例：パチンコ店、景品買取店、問屋の取引をたどり、後編の県の商品券事業に関する仮定の問いにつなげます。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg 七個評審，自己人要幾票？一題純屬假設的數學數字驗算實例：把七人評選委員會的外聘比例、開會門檻與出席人數逐一帶入，驗算不同出席情境下的內外部委員票數。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg Seven panelists: how many votes do insiders need? A purely hypothetical calculation A number-check example: calculate external-member ratios, meeting thresholds and attendance in a seven-member selection committee, then compare the resulting votes. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg 審査員7人、内部委員は何票あればよいのか。あくまで仮定の計算問題数字の検算の実例：7人の選考委員会について、外部委員の比率、会議成立要件、出席人数を順に当てはめ、内外の委員の票数を比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg 報名大店長沒上，講師倒是一路接案問題發掘實例：對照職訓講師、進駐店家與兩件職人町採購紀錄，追問主題行銷及營運管理的承接關係。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 48 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg Applicants miss out on the entrepreneurship course while an instructor keeps winning contracts An issue-discovery example: compare a training instructor, park tenancy and two Artisan Town contracts to examine the links between marketing and operations. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 48 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg 起業講座に申し込んでも入れない。その講師は次々と事業を受注している問題の発見の実例：職業訓練講師、出店者、職人町の2件の調達記録を照合し、広報と運営管理の受託関係を確認します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 48 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg 年輕人留不住，縣府追了嗎？問題發掘實例：對照青年穩定就業獎助每年 1,500 萬元、原規劃 250 人與實際核定人數，追問未完成請領及提前離職的原因追蹤。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 47 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg Young people do not stay. Has the county followed up? An issue-discovery example: compare the youth employment grant’s annual NT$15 million budget, planned 250 recipients and actual approvals, then ask how incomplete claims and early departures were followed up. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 47 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg 若者が定着しない。県はその理由を追ったのか？問題の発見の実例：青年安定就業助成の年1,500万元、計画250人と実際の認定人数を比較し、未請求や早期離職の理由を追跡したかを問います。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 47 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg 被縣府列黑名單？換成依法申請文件，還是同一句話擋掉陳情分流實例：依法申請職人町耐震補強的原始計畫書，對照機關援引行政程序法第 173 條的處理，追問政府資訊公開法下的准駁。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 50 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg Blacklisted by the county? A lawful records request meets the same barrier A petition-routing example: request the original plan for Artisan Town’s seismic retrofit and compare the reply invoking Article 173 with the decision required under the Freedom of Government Information Law. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 50 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg 県のブラックリストに入ったのか。法律に基づく資料請求も同じ一言で止められる陳情の振り分けの実例：職人町の耐震補強計画書を情報公開請求し、行政手続法第173条を引用した回答と政府情報公開法による判断を照合します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 50 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg 傳播處的評審，自己人佔近六成，學者只有 3.4% 數字驗算實例：統計傳播暨國際事務處 55 個標案，內部委員佔 57%、大學學者佔 3.4%，與縣府其他機關中位數比較。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg Communications selection panels: nearly 60% insiders, only 3.4% academics A number-check example: in 55 communications and international affairs contracts, internal members accounted for 57% and university academics for 3.4%, compared with county-agency medians. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg 広報部門の審査員は内部が約6割、大学研究者は3.4%だけ数字の検算の実例：広報・国際事務部門の55案件で内部委員57%、大学研究者3.4%という構成を、県の各機関の中央値と比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg 職人町耐震評估報告，縣府回我：173條，不處理陳情分流實例：核對民國 108 年職人町耐震評估、17 天後開幕與後續危險建築列管，追問縣府為何拒絕處理報告申請。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 73 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg Artisan Town’s seismic assessment: the county replies “Article 173, no action” A petition-routing example: compare the 2019 seismic assessment, Artisan Town’s opening 17 days later and its later dangerous-building listing, then ask why the report request was rejected. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 73 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg 職人町の耐震評価報告。県の回答は「173条、処理しない」陳情の振り分けの実例：民国108年の耐震評価、17日後の開業、その後の危険建築としての管理を照合し、報告請求への対応を問います。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 73 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣政府行政大樓打掃十一年同一家得標，四年只有一家來投：我為什麼壓了這麼久問題發掘實例：核對行政大樓十一年清潔決標、近四年單一投標，以及五件合計 1,854 萬元的採購，提出公開人數工時薪資保障與改善競爭條件的要求。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg One company cleaned Pingtung County Hall for eleven years, with one bidder for four years: why I held this story An issue-discovery example: check eleven years of cleaning awards, four recent single-bidder years and five contracts totaling NT$18,540,000, then demand staffing, hours, wage protections and better competition conditions. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県庁舎の清掃は11年連続で同じ会社、直近4年は入札も1社。なぜ話すのを控えていたのか問題の発見の実例：11年の清掃落札、直近4年の単独入札、計1,854万元の5案件を確認し、人員・労働時間・賃金保障の公開と競争条件の改善を求めます。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣政府一億以上的案子，決標價跟預算差不到百分之一？我照三個數字一個一個驗算給你看數字驗算實例：檢查 16 件億元以上採購及 749 件可計算案件，計算決標價與預算比例，並以相同算法對照高雄與其他縣市。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung contracts over NT$100 million: awards within 1% of budget? Checking three figures one by one A number-check example: examine 16 contracts above NT$100 million and 749 calculable awards, calculate award-to-budget ratios and compare Kaohsiung and other jurisdictions using the same method. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の1億元超の案件は落札額と予算の差が1%未満？3つの数字を一つずつ検算する数字の検算の実例：1億元超の16案件と計算可能な749案件の落札額対予算比を求め、同じ方法で高雄や他の県市を比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg 一個地方政府，上面沒有人管的時候，長什麼樣子？監察院沒有委員、地檢的認定沒有機關要接、縣府回信都是一百七十三條陳情分流實例：整理十六封監察院陳情、縣府回函與檢方處分書之間的處理斷點，說明為何改以公開帳本與採購資料持續監督。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg What does a local government look like when no one above it is watching? No Control Yuan members, no agency taking up prosecutors’ findings, county replies citing Article 173 A petition-routing example: trace sixteen Control Yuan petitions, county replies and a prosecutorial disposition to identify gaps in handling, then explain the move to public accounts and procurement data. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg 上から監督する機関がない地方政府はどうなるのか。監察委員不在、検察の認定を受け止める機関もなく、県の回答は173条陳情の振り分けの実例：監察院への16通の陳情、県の回答、検察の処分書の間にある対応の断絶を整理し、公開帳簿と調達資料の検算へ移る理由を示します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/reserve-price-768/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lnj-9uydDxY/maxresdefault.jpg 五億的產線，跟預算差七百六十八塊｜第一次沒人來，第二次一家數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府四件一億以上的最有利標，第一次沒人來，後面一次只來一家，決標價跟預算差 0 到 4,856 元；再對照評審名單，和一件八家來搶的營養午餐採購。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/lnj-9uydDxY 592 2026-10-21T17:46:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/reserve-price-768/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lnj-9uydDxY/maxresdefault.jpg A NT$500 million production line, NT$768 under budget | No bidders the first time, one the second A number-check example: four best-value tenders above NT$100 million in Pingtung County drew no bidders at first, then a single bidder, and were awarded NT$0 to NT$4,856 under budget. We compare the selection panels and a school lunch tender that drew eight bidders. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/lnj-9uydDxY 592 2026-10-21T17:46:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/reserve-price-768/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/lnj-9uydDxY/maxresdefault.jpg 5億元の生産ライン、予算との差は768元｜1回目は誰も来ず、2回目は1社数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府の1億元超の最有利標方式4件は、1回目は応札ゼロ、その後1社だけが応札し、落札額と予算の差は0〜4,856元。審査委員名簿と、8社が競った学校給食の調達も照合します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/lnj-9uydDxY 592 2026-10-21T17:46:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/selected-shop-closed-in-six-months/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Psmqy5GoalU/maxresdefault.jpg 縣府專業評審選出來的店，半年搬走了｜屏東職人町黑箱 EP.1 陳情分流實例：職人町進駐評選落選後，經縣長信箱申請公開評分，縣府只回對方「綜合評分較高」；4 月預警營運風險，縣府回「不予評論」，10 月那間店就搬走了。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Psmqy5GoalU 53 2026-10-12T13:59:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/selected-shop-closed-in-six-months/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Psmqy5GoalU/maxresdefault.jpg The shop picked by the county's expert panel moved out in six months | Pingtung Artisan Town Black Box EP.1 A petition-routing example: after losing the Artisan Town tenant selection, a request through the magistrate's mailbox to disclose the scores got only “higher overall score”; an April warning about operating risk got “no comment”, and the shop moved out in October. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Psmqy5GoalU 53 2026-10-12T13:59:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/selected-shop-closed-in-six-months/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Psmqy5GoalU/maxresdefault.jpg 県の専門審査員が選んだ店、半年で撤退｜屏東職人町ブラックボックス EP.1 陳情の振り分けの実例：職人町の入居選考に落選後、県長メールボックスで点数の公開を求めると、県の回答は相手の「総合評価が高い」だけ。4月に経営リスクを警告すると「コメントしない」、10月にその店は撤退しました。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Psmqy5GoalU 53 2026-10-12T13:59:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/ghost-external-panelists/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Jebjj-1iZs/maxresdefault.jpg 專業幽靈委員在哪裡？｜屏東職人町黑箱 EP.2 陳情分流實例：職人町評選現場評審問能否串連萬聖節，這題佔配分 25%；縣府兩次書面與給監察院的說法都稱有專業外聘委員，6 月問是誰，縣府只回「依法行政、公開透明」。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/9Jebjj-1iZs 60 2026-10-12T14:45:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/ghost-external-panelists/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Jebjj-1iZs/maxresdefault.jpg Where are the expert ghost panelists? | Pingtung Artisan Town Black Box EP.2 A petition-routing example: at the Artisan Town selection, panelists asked whether we would join the Halloween event, an item worth 25% of the score; the county told us twice in writing, and told the Control Yuan, that expert external panelists took part. Asked in June who they were, it replied only “lawful and transparent”. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/9Jebjj-1iZs 60 2026-10-12T14:45:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/ghost-external-panelists/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/9Jebjj-1iZs/maxresdefault.jpg 専門の幽霊委員はどこに？｜屏東職人町ブラックボックス EP.2 陳情の振り分けの実例：職人町の選考で審査員はハロウィンへの参加を尋ね、その項目は配点25%。県は2度の書面と監察院への説明で専門の外部委員がいたとしますが、6月に誰かを尋ねると「法に基づき公開透明」とだけ回答しました。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/9Jebjj-1iZs 60 2026-10-12T14:45:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/event-site-county-responsibility/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3VklFl0TydY/maxresdefault.jpg 縣府的活動現場，跟縣府沒關係？｜屏東職人町黑箱 EP.3 陳情分流實例：職人町重新開幕由縣府發新聞稿公開邀請民眾，現場有人跟拍十幾分鐘、伸手抓工作證；政風處說涉及私人無法介入，勞青處回函卻承認活動委外、依契約督導管理。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3VklFl0TydY 59 2026-10-12T15:51:12+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/event-site-county-responsibility/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3VklFl0TydY/maxresdefault.jpg The county's own event, and the county says it has nothing to do with it? | Pingtung Artisan Town Black Box EP.3 A petition-routing example: the county publicly invited residents to Artisan Town's reopening by press release; on site, a man filmed us for over ten minutes and another grabbed a staff badge. The ethics department called it a private matter, while the department's letter admits the event was contracted out and supervised under contract. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3VklFl0TydY 59 2026-10-12T15:51:12+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/event-site-county-responsibility/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3VklFl0TydY/maxresdefault.jpg 県のイベント会場なのに、県とは無関係？｜屏東職人町ブラックボックス EP.3 陳情の振り分けの実例：職人町の再開は県がプレスリリースで市民を公に招待。会場では10分以上の付きまとい撮影と社員証をつかむ行為がありました。政風処は私的な事柄で介入できないとし、労青処の回答書はイベントの委託と契約に基づく監督を認めています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3VklFl0TydY 59 2026-10-12T15:51:12+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/halloween-event-who-is-responsible/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-07hYlqYK3E/maxresdefault.jpg 萬聖節去職人町，出事找誰？｜屏東職人町黑箱 EP.4 陳情分流實例：政風處說職人町活動是勞青處自辦、在府外，縣府沒有安全維護義務；縣府新聞稿、處長宣布開幕活動、處長帶隊萬聖節遊行的報導，掛的全是屏東縣政府。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/-07hYlqYK3E 60 2026-10-12T18:54:54+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/halloween-event-who-is-responsible/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-07hYlqYK3E/maxresdefault.jpg Halloween at Artisan Town. If something goes wrong, who answers? | Pingtung Artisan Town Black Box EP.4 A petition-routing example: the ethics department says Artisan Town events are run by the department itself, off county premises, so the county has no security duty; yet the county press release, the director announcing the opening events and the director leading the Halloween parade all carry the Pingtung County Government name. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/-07hYlqYK3E 60 2026-10-12T18:54:54+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/halloween-event-who-is-responsible/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-07hYlqYK3E/maxresdefault.jpg ハロウィンの職人町、何かあったら誰に？｜屏東職人町ブラックボックス EP.4 陳情の振り分けの実例：政風処は職人町のイベントを労青処の自主開催で県外のため安全維持義務はないとしますが、県のプレスリリース、処長による開業イベントの発表、処長が先導したハロウィンパレードの報道は、すべて屏東県政府の名義です。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/-07hYlqYK3E 60 2026-10-12T18:54:54+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/hakka-library-county-top-up/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5a6ILrq6tbM/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東客家總圖預算變三億七千五，中央一毛都沒加數字驗算實例：屏東客家總圖預計總額從 3 億元追加到 3 億 7,500 萬元，中央補助 2 億 7,000 萬元不變，新增 7,500 萬元縣府自己出；施工標第一次流標，重新公告只等五天，一家投標，3 億 2,870 萬元決標。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5a6ILrq6tbM 72 2026-10-17T20:38:15+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/hakka-library-county-top-up/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5a6ILrq6tbM/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Hakka central library budget grows to NT$375 million, and the central government adds nothing A number-check example: the Pingtung Hakka central library's planned total rose from NT$300 million to NT$375 million, the NT$270 million central subsidy stayed the same, and the county pays the new NT$75 million itself. The construction tender failed the first time, was re-tendered with five days to bid, drew one bidder and was awarded at NT$328,700,000. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5a6ILrq6tbM 72 2026-10-17T20:38:15+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/hakka-library-county-top-up/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5a6ILrq6tbM/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東客家総合図書館の予算が3億7,500万元に、中央は1元も増やさず数字の検算の実例：屏東客家総合図書館の予定総額は3億元から3億7,500万元に追加され、中央補助2億7,000万元は変わらず、新たな7,500万元は県が自ら負担。施工の入札は1回目が不調、再公告の期間はわずか5日、応札1社で3億2,870万元で落札。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5a6ILrq6tbM 72 2026-10-17T20:38:15+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/early-intervention-745-waiting/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PXIzZIZg23A/maxresdefault.jpg 孩子在等，你們在研議：屏東早療745案還沒開案評估，一年編了一千六百萬問題發掘實例：審計部審核報告寫明，截至 115 年 3 月 25 日屏東有 696 名孩子、745 案通報後轉介中心還沒受理開案評估，716 案等超過三個月；縣府一年用公益彩券盈餘編 1,600 萬元委託民間，回覆審計部只寫「研議」。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PXIzZIZg23A 197 2026-10-18T15:02:01+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/early-intervention-745-waiting/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PXIzZIZg23A/maxresdefault.jpg The children wait while you deliberate: 745 early-intervention cases in Pingtung still not assessed, NT$16 million budgeted a year An issue-discovery example: the National Audit Office reports that as of 25 March 2026, 696 children in Pingtung (745 cases) had been reported but not yet taken in by the referral center for assessment, 716 cases waiting over three months. The county budgets NT$16 million a year of lottery surplus for the contractor, and told the auditors it would "deliberate". https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PXIzZIZg23A 197 2026-10-18T15:02:01+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/early-intervention-745-waiting/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PXIzZIZg23A/maxresdefault.jpg 子どもは待ち、あなたたちは検討中：屏東の早期療育745件が受理評価前、年1,600万元の予算問題の発見の実例：審計部の審査報告によると、2026年3月25日時点で屏東では696人・745件が通報後も紹介センターに受理評価されず、716件が3か月以上待っています。県は公益宝くじ剰余金から年1,600万元を民間委託に充て、審計部への回答は「検討する」だけでした。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PXIzZIZg23A 197 2026-10-18T15:02:01+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/public-ledger-recount/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G63EmirIfZM/maxresdefault.jpg 你公開的帳本，我驗算，算不攏｜四年 483 萬同一家、每年一家來投數字驗算實例：屏東縣勞青處的屏東青航站四年 4,833,277 元，同一家得標、每年只有一家來投、四筆決標金額都等於預算；115 年施政計畫三個處 117 項指標只有 1 項量成效；114 年度每收 100 元，88 元是中央給的。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/G63EmirIfZM 438 2026-10-18T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/public-ledger-recount/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G63EmirIfZM/maxresdefault.jpg You published the books, I ran the numbers, they don't add up | NT$4,833,277 over four years, one firm, one bidder a year A number-check example: Pingtung's Youth Hub contract paid NT$4,833,277 over four years to the same firm, with one bidder each year and every award equal to budget; 117 indicators across three departments measure outcomes only once; in 2025, NT$88 of every NT$100 came from the central government. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/G63EmirIfZM 438 2026-10-18T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/public-ledger-recount/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/G63EmirIfZM/maxresdefault.jpg 公開された帳簿を検算したら合わない｜4年で483万元、同じ業者、毎年応札1社数字の検算の実例：屏東県労働青年発展処の屏東青航站は4年で4,833,277元、同じ業者が落札し、毎年応札は1社、落札額は4件とも予算と同額。2026年度施政計画の3処117指標のうち成果を測るのは1項だけ。2025年度は収入100元のうち88元が中央からです。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/G63EmirIfZM 438 2026-10-18T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/flat-local-tax-rising-spending/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rTWzc-Puxk0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東自己徵的稅四年沒動，錢越花越多，靠中央還拿錢去放煙火？數字驗算實例：屏東每人自己徵到的地方稅 110 年度 6,895 元、114 年度 6,644 元，四年沒動還少了 251 元；每人歲出從 57,129 元漲到 73,711 元，漲了 29%；自籌財源比率從 19.8% 掉到 11.8%。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/rTWzc-Puxk0 46 2026-10-18T21:00:23+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/flat-local-tax-rising-spending/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rTWzc-Puxk0/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's own taxes flat for four years, spending keeps rising, and central money goes on fireworks? A number-check example: local tax collected per person in Pingtung was NT$6,895 in 2021 and NT$6,644 in 2025, flat for four years and NT$251 lower; spending per person rose from NT$57,129 to NT$73,711, up 29%; the self-financing ratio fell from 19.8% to 11.8%. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/rTWzc-Puxk0 46 2026-10-18T21:00:23+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/flat-local-tax-rising-spending/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/rTWzc-Puxk0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東の自主課税は4年横ばい、支出は増え続け、中央頼みで花火まで？数字の検算の実例：屏東の1人当たり地方自主課税は2021年度6,895元、2025年度6,644元で4年間横ばい、むしろ251元減少。1人当たり歳出は57,129元から73,711元へ29%増。自主財源比率は19.8%から11.8%に下がりました。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/rTWzc-Puxk0 46 2026-10-18T21:00:23+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/early-intervention-audit-reply/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z4ZJB70PeT0/maxresdefault.jpg 審計部函請屏東縣府檢討早期療育，縣府回研議、提報、討論，孩子在等陳情分流實例：審計部把屏東早療 745 案未受理寫進審核報告並函請縣府檢討，縣府據復只有蒐集、參考、研議、提報聯繫會報；屏東市 218 案、內埔 56 案、萬丹 50 案還在等。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/z4ZJB70PeT0 54 2026-10-18T23:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/early-intervention-audit-reply/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z4ZJB70PeT0/maxresdefault.jpg The auditors asked Pingtung County to review early intervention; the county replied: deliberate, submit, discuss. The children wait. A petition-routing example: the National Audit Office put Pingtung's 745 untaken early-intervention cases in its report and asked the county to review. The county's reply only gathers, refers, deliberates and submits to a liaison meeting, while 218 cases in Pingtung City, 56 in Neipu and 50 in Wandan keep waiting. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/z4ZJB70PeT0 54 2026-10-18T23:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/early-intervention-audit-reply/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/z4ZJB70PeT0/maxresdefault.jpg 審計部が屏東県に早期療育の改善を求め、県は検討・提出・議論と回答。子どもは待っている陳情の振り分けの実例：審計部は屏東の早期療育で未受理の745件を審査報告に書き、県に改善を求めました。県の回答は収集、参考、検討、連絡会議への提出だけ。屏東市218件、内埔56件、万丹50件がまだ待っています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/z4ZJB70PeT0 54 2026-10-18T23:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seismic-assessment-six-year-gap/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/js5qpThUe40/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東職人町：耐震評估六年前就做了，六年半兩任縣長，縣府在等什麼？問題發掘實例：屏東職人町 107 年 4 月先決標環境改善工程，108 年 1 月 15 日才決標耐震評估，17 天後開幕；補強工程拖到 114 年 6 月才決標，金額等於預算；經營管理案只有一家來投、決標等於預算，評選名單坐著勞青處長。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/js5qpThUe40 441 2026-10-19T15:57:02+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seismic-assessment-six-year-gap/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/js5qpThUe40/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Artisan Town: the seismic assessment was done six years ago. Six and a half years and two magistrates later, what is the county waiting for? An issue-discovery example: Artisan Town's renovation was awarded in April 2018, its seismic assessment only on January 15, 2019, and it opened 17 days later. The retrofit waited until June 2025 and was awarded at budget; the management contract drew one bidder, was awarded at budget, and the labor and youth director sat on the panel. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/js5qpThUe40 441 2026-10-19T15:57:02+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seismic-assessment-six-year-gap/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/js5qpThUe40/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東・職人町：耐震評価は6年前に済んでいた。6年半、県知事は2代、県は何を待っていたのか問題の発見の実例：屏東・職人町は2018年4月に環境改善工事を先に落札、耐震評価の落札は2019年1月15日、その17日後に開業。補強工事は2025年6月まで落札されず、金額は予算と同額。運営管理委託は応札1社、落札額は予算と同額、審査委員名簿には労働青年発展処の処長がいます。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/js5qpThUe40 441 2026-10-19T15:57:02+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/youth-hub-same-vendor-four-years/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KGLyAlg0GZE/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東青航站的案子四年同一家得標，每年只有一家來投，比企劃書是跟誰比？數字驗算實例：屏東縣勞青處的屏東青航站四年四案合計 4,833,277 元，四年同一家得標，每年投標廠商家數都是 1，四筆總決標金額都等於預算金額；114 年那筆預算編到個位數，決標也剛好到個位數。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/KGLyAlg0GZE 42 2026-10-19T22:00:27+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/youth-hub-same-vendor-four-years/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KGLyAlg0GZE/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung Youth Hub: the same winner four years running, one bidder a year. Who is the proposal competing against? A number-check example: four Pingtung Youth Hub contracts from the Labor and Youth Development Department total NT$4,833,277. The same firm won all four years, each notice lists one bidder, and every award equals the budget; the 2025 budget was set to the single dollar and the award matched it to the single dollar. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/KGLyAlg0GZE 42 2026-10-19T22:00:27+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/youth-hub-same-vendor-four-years/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/KGLyAlg0GZE/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東青航站、4年続けて同じ業者が落札、毎年応札は1社。企画書は誰と比べたのか？数字の検算の実例：屏東県労働青年発展処の屏東青航站は4年4件で合計4,833,277元。4年とも同じ業者が落札し、毎年の応札業者数は1、落札総額は4件とも予算額と同じ。2025年の予算は1元単位まで組まれ、落札額もぴったり1元単位で一致しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/KGLyAlg0GZE 42 2026-10-19T22:00:27+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/sichongxi-bath-execution-rate/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uMu9sKpOakI/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府預算寫得很好看，那錢呢？四重溪溫泉公共浴室執行率5.33% 數字驗算實例：審計部算出四重溪溫泉公共浴室 2024 年可用 7,000 萬元、只花 373 萬 1 千元，執行率 5.33%；縣長公報寫的冷鏈包裝廠三期產線 2027 年 2 月才點交，觀光計畫與恆春觀光鐵道被監察院、審計部、交通部打回。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/uMu9sKpOakI 179 2026-10-20T13:01:00+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/sichongxi-bath-execution-rate/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uMu9sKpOakI/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's budget looks great, so where's the money? The Sichongxi hot spring public bath at 5.33% execution A number-check example: the National Audit Office found the Sichongxi hot spring public bath had NT$70 million to spend in 2024 and spent NT$3,731,000, a 5.33% execution rate. The cold-chain packaging line promised in the magistrate's bulletin will be handed over in February 2027, and the tourism plans and Hengchun railway were sent back by the Control Yuan, the auditors and the transport ministry. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/uMu9sKpOakI 179 2026-10-20T13:01:00+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/sichongxi-bath-execution-rate/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/uMu9sKpOakI/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府の予算は見栄えがいい、ではお金は？四重渓温泉公共浴場の執行率5.33% 数字の検算の実例：審計部の計算では、四重渓温泉公共浴場は2024年に7,000万元使えたのに支出は373万1千元、執行率5.33%。県知事の公報にあるコールドチェーン包装工場の第3期ラインは2027年2月にようやく引き渡し、観光計画と恒春観光鉄道は監察院・審計部・交通部から差し戻されています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/uMu9sKpOakI 179 2026-10-20T13:01:00+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/dangerous-building-budget-label/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNNOFhvgqIY/maxresdefault.jpg 中央預算書寫著危險建築，屏東職人町從耐震評估到補強隔了六年半，縣府在等什麼？陳情分流實例：屏東職人町的勞動部補助名目是「公有危險建築補強重建」，依政府資訊公開法申請看補助計畫書，縣府只回行政程序法第 173 條第 2 款；耐震評估 108 年 1 月決標，補強 114 年 6 月才決標，中間將近六年半。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PNNOFhvgqIY 46 2026-10-20T19:05:18+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/dangerous-building-budget-label/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNNOFhvgqIY/maxresdefault.jpg The central budget says "dangerous building": six and a half years from Artisan Town's seismic assessment to its retrofit. What is the county waiting for? A petition-routing example: the Ministry of Labor subsidy for Pingtung's Artisan Town is filed under "reinforcement and reconstruction of dangerous public buildings." A freedom-of-information request for the subsidy plan got back only Article 173, Paragraph 2 of the Administrative Procedure Act. The assessment was awarded in January 2019, the retrofit only in June 2025. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PNNOFhvgqIY 46 2026-10-20T19:05:18+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/dangerous-building-budget-label/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/PNNOFhvgqIY/maxresdefault.jpg 中央の予算書には「危険建築」、屏東・職人町は耐震評価から補強まで6年半、県は何を待っているのか陳情の振り分けの実例：屏東・職人町への労働部補助の名目は「公有危険建築の補強・再建」。補助計画書を政府情報公開法で請求すると、県の回答は行政手続法第173条第2号だけ。耐震評価の落札は2019年1月、補強の落札は2025年6月で、その間6年半近く。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/PNNOFhvgqIY 46 2026-10-20T19:05:18+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/retrofit-closure-390-days/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B4pVHxCMUq4/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東職人町補強工程，安全這麼重要，為什麼等到租約剩一年半才做？數字驗算實例：屏東職人町 114 年 3 月 17 日休園，115 年 4 月 11 日重開，實際 390 天；第一次招標流標，6 月 26 日才決標，店家先關門 101 天；決標 1,319 萬元等於預算，勞動部補助 994 萬元，租約明年底到期。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/B4pVHxCMUq4 57 2026-10-20T21:00:11+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/retrofit-closure-390-days/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B4pVHxCMUq4/maxresdefault.jpg Artisan Town's retrofit: if safety matters this much, why wait until only 18 months are left on the lease? A number-check example: Pingtung's Artisan Town closed on 2025/3/17 and reopened on 2026/4/11, 390 days. The first tender failed and the award came only on June 26, leaving shops closed for 101 days first. The NT$13,190,000 award equals budget, the Ministry of Labor paid NT$9,940,000, and the lease ends late next year. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/B4pVHxCMUq4 57 2026-10-20T21:00:11+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/retrofit-closure-390-days/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/B4pVHxCMUq4/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東・職人町の補強工事、安全がそれほど大事なら、なぜ賃貸契約が残り1年半になるまで待ったのか数字の検算の実例：屏東・職人町は2025年3月17日に休園、2026年4月11日に再開、実際は390日。1回目の入札は不調、落札は6月26日で、店舗は先に101日間閉鎖。落札額1,319万元は予算と同額、労働部の補助は994万元、賃貸契約は来年末に満了。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/B4pVHxCMUq4 57 2026-10-20T21:00:11+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/evaluator-on-selection-panels/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5C4lTSVgRmo/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣政府研考處是裁判，也在傳播處、勞青處的評審名單上：裁判下場打球，合法嗎？數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府研考處負責列管考核各處計畫，傳播處 84 筆公開評選有 55 筆評審名單上有研考處的人、45 筆有出席；勞青處長列名的 54 件裡，17 件跟同一位研考處科長同列，11 件兩人都到場。年底研考處再考核這兩個處。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5C4lTSVgRmo 211 2026-10-20T22:17:30+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/evaluator-on-selection-panels/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5C4lTSVgRmo/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Research and Evaluation Department is the referee, and it also sits on Communications and Labor and Youth selection panels: is a referee playing in the game legal? A number-check example: Pingtung County's Research and Evaluation Department monitors and grades other departments' programs. Of 84 Communications Department selections, 55 had its staff on the panel and 45 recorded them present; of 54 selections listing the Labor and Youth director, 17 also listed the same Research and Evaluation section chief and both attended 11. At year-end the department grades both. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5C4lTSVgRmo 211 2026-10-20T22:17:30+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/evaluator-on-selection-panels/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/5C4lTSVgRmo/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府の研考処は審判、しかも伝播処と労働青年発展処の審査委員名簿にも：審判が試合に出るのは合法か数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府の研考処は各処の計画を管理・考核します。伝播処の公開評価84件のうち55件で審査委員名簿に研考処職員が載り、45件で出席。労働青年発展処長が載る54件のうち17件は同じ研考処の科長と同じ名簿、11件は2人とも出席。年末、研考処がこの2つの処を考核します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/5C4lTSVgRmo 211 2026-10-20T22:17:30+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/early-intervention-budget-backlog/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3SIxMUEL3O4/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府委託民間做早療一年編了一千六百萬，三月二十五號桌上還壓著七百四十五案數字驗算實例：屏東縣府用公益彩券盈餘一年編 1,600 萬元委託民間做早療通報轉介與個案管理，115 年 3 月 25 日還有 745 案未受理開案評估；全國通報往上，屏東托嬰中心與居家托育三年通報 29、16、12 人。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3SIxMUEL3O4 55 2026-10-21T12:00:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/early-intervention-budget-backlog/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3SIxMUEL3O4/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung County budgets NT$16 million a year to contract out early intervention, and on 25 March 745 cases were still sitting on the desk A number-check example: Pingtung County budgets NT$16 million a year of lottery surplus to contract out early-intervention referral and case management, yet on 25 March 2026 745 cases had not been taken in for assessment. National reports keep rising while Pingtung's infant care centers and home childcare providers filed 29, 16 and 12 over three years. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3SIxMUEL3O4 55 2026-10-21T12:00:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/early-intervention-budget-backlog/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/3SIxMUEL3O4/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県は早期療育の民間委託に年1,600万元を計上、3月25日の机の上には745件数字の検算の実例：屏東県は公益宝くじ剰余金から年1,600万元を早期療育の通報・紹介と個別支援の民間委託に充てていますが、2026年3月25日時点で745件が受理評価前でした。全国の通報は増えているのに、屏東の保育所と家庭保育者の3年間の通報は29、16、12人です。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/3SIxMUEL3O4 55 2026-10-21T12:00:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/audit-report-drainage-90-of-92/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/K2nFDTirBxg/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東八月雨量全台灣最多，審計部報告：92條排水90條沒有完成治理計畫問題發掘實例：屏東站今年八月下了 1,749.5 毫米，全台最多；審計部報告寫著屏東區域排水 92 條有 90 條沒有完成治理計畫，雨水下水道規劃報告 28 份有 19 份超過十年沒檢討，兩處部落之心四種服務全寫未提供。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/K2nFDTirBxg 215 2026-10-21T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/audit-report-drainage-90-of-92/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/K2nFDTirBxg/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung had Taiwan's highest August rainfall. The National Audit Office: 90 of 92 drainage channels have no completed management plan An issue-discovery example: Pingtung station recorded 1,749.5 mm of rain this August, the most in Taiwan. The National Audit Office reports that 90 of Pingtung's 92 regional drainage channels lack a completed management plan, 19 of 28 stormwater sewer plans have not been reviewed in over ten years, and both Heart of the Tribe centers provide none of four listed services. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/K2nFDTirBxg 215 2026-10-21T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/audit-report-drainage-90-of-92/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/K2nFDTirBxg/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東の8月雨量は全台湾最多。審計部の報告：排水92本のうち90本で治理計画が未完成問題の発見の実例：屏東観測所は今年8月に1,749.5ミリで全台湾最多。審計部の報告によれば、屏東の地域排水92本のうち90本で治理計画が未完成、雨水下水道計画報告28件のうち19件が10年以上見直されず、部落之心2か所は4種類のサービスがすべて「未提供」です。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/K2nFDTirBxg 215 2026-10-21T19:00:08+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/labor-youth-director-evaluator-same-panel/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XDEKDTYD4w0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣勞青處長和考核他的研考處科長同桌挑廠商，這樣合法嗎？數字驗算實例：屏東縣勞青處長列名的 54 件評選案，17 件跟同一位研考處科長同列一張評審名單，11 件兩人都到場；到了年底，研考處考核勞青處。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/XDEKDTYD4w0 32 2026-10-21T19:05:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/labor-youth-director-evaluator-same-panel/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XDEKDTYD4w0/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Labor and Youth director picks contractors at the same table as the Research and Evaluation section chief who grades him. Is that legal? A number-check example: of 54 selections listing Pingtung's Labor and Youth director, 17 put the same Research and Evaluation section chief on the same panel list and both attended 11. At year-end, the Research and Evaluation Department grades the Labor and Youth Department. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/XDEKDTYD4w0 32 2026-10-21T19:05:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/labor-youth-director-evaluator-same-panel/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XDEKDTYD4w0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の労働青年発展処長と、彼を考核する研考処の科長が同じ席で業者を選ぶ。これは合法か数字の検算の実例：屏東県の労働青年発展処長が載る評価案54件のうち、17件は同じ研考処の科長と同じ審査委員名簿、11件は2人とも出席。年末、研考処が労働青年発展処を考核します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/XDEKDTYD4w0 32 2026-10-21T19:05:16+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/evaluator-scoreboard-hidden/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y3U8RBAgDLg/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府研考處坐上評審席，年底再考核傳播處、勞青處，比分誰記？問題發掘實例：屏東縣府研考處年底考核傳播處、勞青處，自己又坐在兩處的評審席上；列管計畫清單與評審遴選過程都不公開，兩邊交集多少件，縣府不給對。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Y3U8RBAgDLg 51 2026-10-21T21:00:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/evaluator-scoreboard-hidden/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y3U8RBAgDLg/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Research and Evaluation Department takes a panel seat, then grades Communications and Labor and Youth at year-end. Who keeps score? An issue-discovery example: Pingtung's Research and Evaluation Department grades the Communications and Labor and Youth departments at year-end while sitting on both departments' selection panels. The monitored program list and the panel selection process are both private, so the county lets no one check how many cases overlap. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Y3U8RBAgDLg 51 2026-10-21T21:00:32+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/evaluator-scoreboard-hidden/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Y3U8RBAgDLg/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の研考処が審査席に座り、年末に伝播処と労働青年発展処を考核する。スコアは誰がつけるのか問題の発見の実例：屏東県の研考処は年末に伝播処と労働青年発展処を考核しながら、両処の審査席にも座っています。管理対象計画の一覧も審査員の選任過程も非公開で、両者が何件重なるのか、県は照合させません。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Y3U8RBAgDLg 51 2026-10-21T21:00:32+08:00 yes no no