https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東勞青處：青年的預算翻了快四倍，勞工的少了兩成多。這個處的名字，第一個字是「勞」 數字驗算實例：勞青處預算從民國 112 年到今年，勞工由 2 億 2,600 萬降到 1 億 7,600 萬，青年由 4,400 萬升到 1 億 6,400 萬；再對照勞動部年報的檢查場次與違法比例。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung's Department of Labor and Youth Development: the youth budget nearly quadrupled while the labor budget fell by more than 20%. Labor comes first in its name A number-check example: from 2023 to this year, the department's labor budget fell from NT$226 million to NT$176 million while its youth budget rose from NT$44 million to NT$164 million, checked against the Ministry of Labor's inspection counts and violation rates. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/labor-youth-budget/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DO0QBHbN7xQ/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の労働青年発展処：青年予算は約4倍、労働予算は2割以上減。この処の名前の最初の字は「労」 数字の検算の実例：民国112年から今年までに、労働青年発展処の労働予算は2億2,600万元から1億7,600万元に減り、青年予算は4,400万元から1億6,400万元に増えました。労働部年報の検査件数と違反率とも照合しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DO0QBHbN7xQ 384 2026-10-14T03:22:58-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府 2,018 筆社區團體補助，報表卻對不上 2,276 萬 數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府 115/7/20 公告的上半年補助報表，2,872 筆明細逐列加總 3 億 7,656 萬元，首頁合計 3 億 5,380 萬元，明細多出 2,276 萬元；7/9 的前一版差額方向相反。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 2,018 community group grants from Pingtung County, and a report that is NT$22,760,000 off A number-check example: in the half-year grant report Pingtung County Government published on 20 July 2026, the 2,872 line items add up to NT$376,560,000 while the summary page states NT$353,800,000, a difference of NT$22,760,000. The version published on 9 July was off in the opposite direction. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/subsidy-report-reconciliation/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/Fi9xcMXYKOw/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府、地域団体への補助2,018件。報告書は2,276万元合わず 数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府が民国115年7月20日に公告した上半期の補助報告書では、明細2,872件を1行ずつ合計すると3億7,656万元、総括ページの合計は3億5,380万元で、明細が2,276万元多くなっています。7月9日の前の版では差が逆方向でした。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/Fi9xcMXYKOw 56 2026-10-13T02:30:07-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣府標案近六成只有一家投標，要投標得先會作夢？ 數字驗算實例：屏東縣政府 114 年公開競爭的 958 件標案中，565 件只有一家投標，將近六成；115 年 2 至 8 月為 52%。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg Nearly 60% of Pingtung County tenders drew a single bidder. Do you have to dream it up before you can bid? A number-check example: of the 958 openly competed tenders Pingtung County Government awarded in 2025 (ROC year 114), 565 drew a single bidder, nearly 60%. From February to August 2026 (ROC year 115) the share was 52%. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/single-bidder-tenders/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cnXa1CHfHHs/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県政府の入札、約6割が1社だけの応札。入札するには、まず夢を見る力が必要？ 数字の検算の実例：屏東県政府が民国114年に公開競争で落札させた958件のうち、565件は応札が1社だけで、約6割でした。民国115年2月から8月では52%です。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/cnXa1CHfHHs 48 2026-10-13T03:22:22-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg 只有一家來投，就一定有問題嗎？三種解釋，三種痕跡 問題發掘實例：屏東縣政府標案將近六成只有一家來投。先列出三種解釋：真的很難、法律允許第二次一家決標、有人先知道了；每一種留下的痕跡不同，再逐案對照。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg A single bidder: does it always mean something is wrong? Three explanations, three kinds of traces An issue-discovery example: nearly 60% of Pingtung County Government tenders drew a single bidder. Three explanations come first: the job is genuinely hard; the law allows a single bid on the second round; or someone knew in advance. Each leaves different traces, which are then checked case by case. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/single-bidder-three-explanations/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/STqQFe3aMto/maxresdefault.jpg 応札が1社だけなら、必ず問題があるのか？3つの説明、3つの痕跡 問題の発見の実例：屏東県政府の入札案件の約6割は応札が1社だけ。まず3つの説明を挙げます。本当に難しい、法律上2回目は1社でも落札できる、誰かが事前に知っていた。それぞれ残る痕跡が違うため、1件ずつ照合します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/STqQFe3aMto 106 2026-10-15T21:21:46-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg 花 1,319 萬修租來的房子，修好只剩一年半就要還？屏東職人町 陳情分流實例：屏東職人町耐震補強 1,319 萬元，其中勞動部前瞻補助 994 萬元，補助名目是職訓及勞工中心；租約明年底到期。審計部已回函表示會辦理專案調查。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 54 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg NT$13,190,000 to repair a leased building, with only a year and a half left before it goes back? Pingtung's Artisan Town A petition-routing example: the NT$13,190,000 seismic retrofit of Pingtung's Artisan Town included NT$9,940,000 in Forward-Looking Infrastructure funding from the Ministry of Labor, granted for a vocational training and labor center. The lease ends at the end of next year. The National Audit Office has replied that it will open a special investigation. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 54 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seismic-retrofit-leased-building/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzUdvYwraRo/maxresdefault.jpg 借りた建物の修繕に1,319万元、修繕後1年半で返還？屏東の職人町 陳情の振り分けの実例：屏東・職人町の耐震補強1,319万元のうち、994万元は労働部の前瞻補助で、名目は職業訓練・労働センターでした。賃貸契約は来年末に満了します。審計部は特別調査を行うと回答しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/yzUdvYwraRo 54 2026-10-13T02:52:42-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg 縣府的青年頻道，最新 30 支影片 26 支看不到 100 次 問題發掘實例：屏東縣政府勞青處的青年頻道，最新 30 支影片有 26 支觀看未滿 100 次，中位數 24 次；再對照旅遊創新人才培育計畫的決標公告與中央補助金額。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 69 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg The county's youth channel: 26 of its latest 30 videos have under 100 views An issue-discovery example: on the youth channel run by Pingtung County's Department of Labor and Youth Development, 26 of the latest 30 videos had fewer than 100 views, with a median of 24, checked against the award notice and central government funding for a tourism innovation training program. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 69 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/youth-channel-views/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OjjkJZR4LUA/maxresdefault.jpg 県政府の青年向けチャンネル、最新30本のうち26本が再生100回未満 問題の発見の実例：屏東県政府労働青年発展処の青年向けチャンネルでは、最新30本のうち26本が再生100回未満、中央値は24回。観光イノベーション人材育成計画の落札公告と中央政府の補助額とも照合しています。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OjjkJZR4LUA 69 2026-10-14T01:52:48-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg 假設縣府代金券也玩三店方式，這種活動可以辦嗎？（下） 問題發掘實例：以日本柏青哥的三店方式為對照，假設縣府代金券的發放核銷廠商與收券店家是同一位老闆，每一步都合法，整個活動能不能辦？ https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 58 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg What if a county voucher scheme used the "three-shop system"? Could an event like this go ahead? (Part 2) An issue-discovery example: using the three-shop system of Japanese pachinko as a reference, suppose the contractor that issues and redeems a county's vouchers and a shop that accepts them have the same owner. Every step is legal. Can the event as a whole go ahead? https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 58 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/voucher-three-shop-hypothetical/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/OAaLLriChWw/maxresdefault.jpg もし県の商品券が「三店方式」をまねたら、こんなイベントは開けるのか？（後編） 問題の発見の実例：日本のパチンコの三店方式を参照し、県の商品券の配布と換金を請け負う業者と、券を受け取る店のオーナーが同じ人物だと仮定します。どの段階も合法。では、イベント全体は開けるのでしょうか。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/OAaLLriChWw 58 2026-10-14T02:02:21-07:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg 日本柏青哥為什麼合法？三店方式，每一步都合法（上） 問題發掘實例：以柏青哥店、獎品收購店與批發商的往來，說明三店方式的流程，為下集的縣府代金券假設題建立對照。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg Why is Japanese pachinko legal? The three-shop system, one legal step at a time (Part 1) An issue-discovery example: follow the pachinko parlor, prize-buying shop and wholesaler to establish a comparison for Part 2’s hypothetical county voucher scheme. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/pachinko-three-shop-system/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS1srCTgBkA/maxresdefault.jpg 日本のパチンコはなぜ合法なのか。三店方式、どの段階も合法（前編） 問題の発見の実例：パチンコ店、景品買取店、問屋の取引をたどり、後編の県の商品券事業に関する仮定の問いにつなげます。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/TS1srCTgBkA 38 2026-10-14T16:57:42+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg 七個評審，自己人要幾票？一題純屬假設的數學 數字驗算實例：把七人評選委員會的外聘比例、開會門檻與出席人數逐一帶入，驗算不同出席情境下的內外部委員票數。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg Seven panelists: how many votes do insiders need? A purely hypothetical calculation A number-check example: calculate external-member ratios, meeting thresholds and attendance in a seven-member selection committee, then compare the resulting votes. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seven-member-selection-arithmetic/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/AELEs564KVg/maxresdefault.jpg 審査員7人、内部委員は何票あればよいのか。あくまで仮定の計算問題 数字の検算の実例：7人の選考委員会について、外部委員の比率、会議成立要件、出席人数を順に当てはめ、内外の委員の票数を比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/AELEs564KVg 60 2026-10-16T13:21:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg 報名大店長沒上，講師倒是一路接案 問題發掘實例：對照職訓講師、進駐店家與兩件職人町採購紀錄，追問主題行銷及營運管理的承接關係。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 47 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg Applicants miss out on the entrepreneurship course while an instructor keeps winning contracts An issue-discovery example: compare a training instructor, park tenancy and two Artisan Town contracts to examine the links between marketing and operations. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 47 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/training-instructor-procurement-links/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gUXBz5502Iw/maxresdefault.jpg 起業講座に申し込んでも入れない。その講師は次々と事業を受注している 問題の発見の実例：職業訓練講師、出店者、職人町の2件の調達記録を照合し、広報と運営管理の受託関係を確認します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gUXBz5502Iw 47 2026-10-16T13:32:49+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg 年輕人留不住，縣府追了嗎？ 問題發掘實例：對照青年穩定就業獎助每年 1,500 萬元、原規劃 250 人與實際核定人數，追問未完成請領及提前離職的原因追蹤。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 46 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg Young people do not stay. Has the county followed up? An issue-discovery example: compare the youth employment grant’s annual NT$15 million budget, planned 250 recipients and actual approvals, then ask how incomplete claims and early departures were followed up. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 46 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/youth-employment-retention-followup/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hini_991SAE/maxresdefault.jpg 若者が定着しない。県はその理由を追ったのか？ 問題の発見の実例：青年安定就業助成の年1,500万元、計画250人と実際の認定人数を比較し、未請求や早期離職の理由を追跡したかを問います。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/hini_991SAE 46 2026-10-16T13:45:39+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg 被縣府列黑名單？換成依法申請文件，還是同一句話擋掉 陳情分流實例：依法申請職人町耐震補強的原始計畫書，對照機關援引行政程序法第 173 條的處理，追問政府資訊公開法下的准駁。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 49 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg Blacklisted by the county? A lawful records request meets the same barrier A petition-routing example: request the original plan for Artisan Town’s seismic retrofit and compare the reply invoking Article 173 with the decision required under the Freedom of Government Information Law. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 49 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/information-request-petition-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fSJtbXYHr5U/maxresdefault.jpg 県のブラックリストに入ったのか。法律に基づく資料請求も同じ一言で止められる 陳情の振り分けの実例：職人町の耐震補強計画書を情報公開請求し、行政手続法第173条を引用した回答と政府情報公開法による判断を照合します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/fSJtbXYHr5U 49 2026-10-16T13:53:04+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg 傳播處的評審，自己人佔近六成，學者只有 3.4% 數字驗算實例：統計傳播暨國際事務處 55 個標案，內部委員佔 57%、大學學者佔 3.4%，與縣府其他機關中位數比較。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg Communications selection panels: nearly 60% insiders, only 3.4% academics A number-check example: in 55 communications and international affairs contracts, internal members accounted for 57% and university academics for 3.4%, compared with county-agency medians. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/communications-selection-panel-comparison/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/bNzVzIASKPs/maxresdefault.jpg 広報部門の審査員は内部が約6割、大学研究者は3.4%だけ 数字の検算の実例：広報・国際事務部門の55案件で内部委員57%、大学研究者3.4%という構成を、県の各機関の中央値と比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/bNzVzIASKPs 46 2026-10-16T14:01:52+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg 職人町耐震評估報告，縣府回我：173條，不處理 陳情分流實例：核對民國 108 年職人町耐震評估、17 天後開幕與後續危險建築列管，追問縣府為何拒絕處理報告申請。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 72 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg Artisan Town’s seismic assessment: the county replies “Article 173, no action” A petition-routing example: compare the 2019 seismic assessment, Artisan Town’s opening 17 days later and its later dangerous-building listing, then ask why the report request was rejected. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 72 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/seismic-report-information-barrier/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YUsQO3FtKA0/maxresdefault.jpg 職人町の耐震評価報告。県の回答は「173条、処理しない」 陳情の振り分けの実例：民国108年の耐震評価、17日後の開業、その後の危険建築としての管理を照合し、報告請求への対応を問います。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/YUsQO3FtKA0 72 2026-10-16T15:32:59+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣政府行政大樓打掃十一年同一家得標，四年只有一家來投：我為什麼壓了這麼久 問題發掘實例：核對行政大樓十一年清潔決標、近四年單一投標，以及五件合計 1,854 萬元的採購，提出公開人數工時薪資保障與改善競爭條件的要求。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg One company cleaned Pingtung County Hall for eleven years, with one bidder for four years: why I held this story An issue-discovery example: check eleven years of cleaning awards, four recent single-bidder years and five contracts totaling NT$18,540,000, then demand staffing, hours, wage protections and better competition conditions. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/eleven-year-cleaning-contracts/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/vFIooqY-2l0/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県庁舎の清掃は11年連続で同じ会社、直近4年は入札も1社。なぜ話すのを控えていたのか 問題の発見の実例：11年の清掃落札、直近4年の単独入札、計1,854万元の5案件を確認し、人員・労働時間・賃金保障の公開と競争条件の改善を求めます。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/vFIooqY-2l0 317 2026-10-16T22:12:07+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東縣政府一億以上的案子，決標價跟預算差不到百分之一？我照三個數字一個一個驗算給你看 數字驗算實例：檢查 16 件億元以上採購及 749 件可計算案件，計算決標價與預算比例，並以相同算法對照高雄與其他縣市。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg Pingtung contracts over NT$100 million: awards within 1% of budget? Checking three figures one by one A number-check example: examine 16 contracts above NT$100 million and 749 calculable awards, calculate award-to-budget ratios and compare Kaohsiung and other jurisdictions using the same method. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/large-contract-budget-award-ratios/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q/maxresdefault.jpg 屏東県の1億元超の案件は落札額と予算の差が1%未満？3つの数字を一つずつ検算する 数字の検算の実例：1億元超の16案件と計算可能な749案件の落札額対予算比を求め、同じ方法で高雄や他の県市を比較します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/gaQ4ZaUKB6Q 400 2026-10-16T22:39:17+08:00 yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg 一個地方政府，上面沒有人管的時候，長什麼樣子？監察院沒有委員、地檢的認定沒有機關要接、縣府回信都是一百七十三條 陳情分流實例：整理十六封監察院陳情、縣府回函與檢方處分書之間的處理斷點，說明為何改以公開帳本與採購資料持續監督。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/en/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg What does a local government look like when no one above it is watching? No Control Yuan members, no agency taking up prosecutors’ findings, county replies citing Article 173 A petition-routing example: trace sixteen Control Yuan petitions, county replies and a prosecutorial disposition to identify gaps in handling, then explain the move to public accounts and procurement data. https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no https://www.4force.com.tw/ja/oversight/videos/oversight-petition-dead-end/ https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DymWxrsfvP8/maxresdefault.jpg 上から監督する機関がない地方政府はどうなるのか。監察委員不在、検察の認定を受け止める機関もなく、県の回答は173条 陳情の振り分けの実例：監察院への16通の陳情、県の回答、検察の処分書の間にある対応の断絶を整理し、公開帳簿と調達資料の検算へ移る理由を示します。 https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/DymWxrsfvP8 659 2026-10-17T01:25:41Z yes no no